Sauer, J. D., Brewer, N., & Weber, N. (2012). Using confidence ratings to identify a target among foils. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 80-88.
Sauer, J. D., Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2012). Using ecphoric confidence ratings to discriminate seen from unseen faces: The effects of retention interval and distinctiveness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 490-498.
Palmer, M. A., Brewer, N., & Weber, N. (2012). The information gained from witnesses’ responses to an initial “blank” lineup. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 439-447.
Palmer, M. A., & Brewer, N. (2012). Sequential lineup presentation promotes less biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 247-255.
Palmer, M. A., Horry, R., & Brewer, N. (2011). Court relevant research methods. In K. Sheldon, J. Davies, & K. Howells (Eds.), Research in practice for forensic professionals (pp. 86-107). New York, NY: Routledge.
Semmler, C., Brewer, N., & Douglass, A. B. (2011). Jurors believe eyewitnesses. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research (pp. 185-209). Washington, DC: APA Books.
Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2011). Eyewitness identification. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 24-27.
Brewer, N. (2011 The Police Journal (Opinion section): Practical advantages in computerized photo line-ups. (April 2011 Volume 92 No 2)
Brewer, N. (2011). The Conversation: Pictures perfect: Why photo lineups can be better at catching crooks. http://theconversation.edu.au/articles/pictures-perfect-why-photo-lineups-can-be-better-at-catching-crooks-2257
Palmer, M. A., Brewer, N., & Weber, N. (2010). Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 387-398.